My September 5, 2012 article, “2nd Circuit Says Yes to Louboutin’s Red Sole Trademark,” poses the question: “is this decision a true victory for Louboutin or YSL?”  Tamlin H. Bason’s article in Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Daily seems to suggest that both sides are claiming victory. 


Reproduced with permission from Patent,Trademark & Copyright Law Daily, (Sept. 12, 2012). Copyright 2012 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) <>

By Tamlin H. Bason 

Both parties claimed victory after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Sept. 5 determined that Christian Louboutin’s trademark on red soled shoes was valid and that Yves Saint Laurent’s monochrome red shoe did not infringe the registered mark. Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holding Inc., 2d Cir., No. 11-3303-cv, 9/5/12).

Continue Reading Both Sides Claim Victory as 2nd Cir. Upholds Louboutin’s Mark, Says YSL Didn’t Infringe

Right on time for New York’s Fashion Week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled today that “Louboutin’s trademark, consisting of a red, lacquered outsole on a high fashion woman’s shoe” has acquired secondary meaning as a distinctive source-identifier for Louboutin’s luxury brand.  More than one year after a U.S. federal district court denied a preliminary injunction against Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) and issued a decision invalidating Louboutin’s red sole trademark, the Second Circuit has rendered Christian Louboutin’s iconic “Chinese red” soles to be a valid, protectable, and enforceable trademark.

Continue Reading 2nd Circuit Says Yes to Louboutin’s Red Sole Trademark