<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>Re:Marks on Copyright and Trademark - Taking franchise disputes to the internet: judicial absolute immunity does not apply - Comments</title>
      <link>http://www.remarksblog.com/</link>
      <description>Lawyer &amp; Attorney for Intellectual Property Protection : DLA Piper Law Firm</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:57:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:57:15 -0600</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Franchise Lawyer</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Yes definitely the franchise must not do that and they should take the help of the mediator to solve their Franchise Disputes. They must do some compromise but as the quality of the product concern they should take care of that.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.remarksblog.com/internet/taking-franchise-disputes-to-the-internet-judicial-absolute-immunity-does-not-apply/#133154</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.remarksblog.com/internet/taking-franchise-disputes-to-the-internet-judicial-absolute-immunity-does-not-apply/#133154</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.remarksblog.com/">Case Brief</category><category domain="http://www.remarksblog.com/">Client Alert</category><category domain="http://www.remarksblog.com/">Internet</category><category domain="http://www.remarksblog.com/">Media</category><category domain="http://www.remarksblog.com/">Social Media</category><category domain="http://www.remarksblog.com/">USA</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:08:32 -0600</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Debbie Rosenbaum</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>